Quantifying the handprint—Footprint balance into a single score: The example of pharmaceuticals

6Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Life Cycle Assessment typically focuses on the footprint of products and services, expressed on three Areas of Protection (AoP): Human Health, Ecosystems and Resources. While the handprint is often expressed qualitatively, quantified handprints have recently been compared directly to the footprint concerning one AoP: Human Health. We propose to take this one step further by simultaneously comparing the quantified handprint and footprint on all AoPs through normalization and weighting of the results towards a single score. We discuss two example cases of a pharmaceutical treatment: mebendazole to treat soil-transmitted helminthiases and paliperidone palmitate to treat schizophrenia. Each time, treatment is compared to ‘no treatment’. The footprint of health care is compared to the handprint of improved patient health. The handprint and footprint were normalized separately. To include sensitivity in the normalization step we applied four sets of external normalization factors for both handprint (Global Burden of Disease) and footprint (ReCiPe and PROSUITE). At the weighting step we applied 26 sets of panel weighting factors from three sources. We propose the Relative Sustainability Benefit Rate (RSBR) as a new metric to quantify the relative difference in combined handprint and footprint single score between two alternatives. When only considering the footprint, the first case study is associated with an increased single score burden of treatment compared to ‘no treatment’, while in the second case study treatment reduces the single score burden by 41.1% compared to ‘no treatment’. Also including the handprint provided new insights for the first case study, now showing a decrease of 56.4% in single score burden for treatment compared to ‘no treatment’. For the second case study the reduction of single score burden was confirmed as the handprint burden was also decreased because of treatment by 9.9%, reinforcing the findings.

References Powered by Scopus

Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016

5956Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Extinction risk from climate change

5928Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015

5819Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Quantifying the life-cycle health impacts of a cobalt-containing lithium-ion battery

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Life cycle assessment as tool for realization of sustainable development goals-towards sustainable future of the world: Mini review

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A holistic framework for integrated sustainability assessment of pharmaceuticals

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Debaveye, S., de Smedt, D., Heirman, B., Kavanagh, S., & Dewulf, J. (2020). Quantifying the handprint—Footprint balance into a single score: The example of pharmaceuticals. PLoS ONE, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229235

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

62%

Researcher 9

35%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 5

31%

Chemical Engineering 4

25%

Engineering 4

25%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

19%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free