Is positron emission tomography an accurate non-invasive alternative to sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients?

24Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In summary, based on the present literature (14-16) and on own experience (13), we suggest that PET scanning does not currently have the adequate spatial resolution to detect both micro- and small macro-metastatic disease in axillary lymph nodes of patients with breast cancer. Therefore, PET scanning cannot serve at this time as a non-invasive alternative to SLN biopsy. It is possible, however, that with the advent of new detector materials in clinical practice (e.g., lithium, silicon, curved crystals), the sensitivity of 18F-FDG-PET will further improve (35) and could eventually replace invasive procedures in the evaluation of the nodal status of patients with breast cancer.

References Powered by Scopus

Cancer Statistics, 1999

3152Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sentinel lymphadenectomy in breast cancer

1045Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 1. effect of object size

1031Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Molecular imaging in the clinical arena

330Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

FDG-PET/CT imaging for preradiotherapy staging of head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma

205Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A comparative study on the value of FDG-PET and sentinel node biopsy to identify occult axillary metastases

183Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guller, U., Nitzsche, E., Moch, H., & Zuber, M. (2003). Is positron emission tomography an accurate non-invasive alternative to sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients? Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 95(14), 1040–1043. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/95.14.1040

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

44%

Researcher 4

44%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 4

44%

Engineering 3

33%

Chemical Engineering 1

11%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free