Accuracy of In Vivo Carotid B-Mode Ultrasound Compared With Pathological Analysis

  • Schulte-Altedorneburg G
  • Droste D
  • Felszeghy S
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and Purpose —This study aimed to determine the correlation of in vivo ultrasound measurements of intima-media thickening (IMT), lumen diameter, and cross-sectional area of the common carotid artery (CCA) with corresponding measurements obtained by gross pathology and histology. Methods —Sixty-six moribund neurological patients (mean age 71 years) underwent B-mode ultrasound of the CCA a few days before death. During autopsy, carotid specimens were removed in toto. Carotid arteries were ligated and cannulated for injection of a hydrophilic embedding material under standardized conditions. The carotid bifurcation was frozen and cut manually in 3-mm cross slices. Digital image analysis was carried out to determine the diameter and the cross-sectional area of the frozen slices of the CCA. IMT was assessed by light microscope. Ultrasonic and planimetric data were compared. Results —Mean measurements of lumen diameter and cross-sectional area were 7.13±1.27 mm and 0.496±0.167 cm 2 , respectively, by ultrasound, and 7.81±1.45 mm and 0.516±0.194 cm 2 , respectively, by planimetric analysis of the unfixed redistended carotid arteries ( R 2 =0.389 and 0.497). The mean IMT was 1.005±0.267 mm by ultrasound and 0.67±0.141 mm histologically, resulting in a mean difference of −31%. Conclusions —Transcutaneous B-mode ultrasound provides a reliable approach for in vivo measurements of the cross-sectional area and, less exactly, of the lumen diameter of the CCA. Compared with histological results, in vivo ultrasound measurements of the IMT are systematically larger.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schulte-Altedorneburg, G., Droste, D. W., Felszeghy, S., Kellermann, M., Popa, V., Hegedüs, K., … Csiba, L. (2001). Accuracy of In Vivo Carotid B-Mode Ultrasound Compared With Pathological Analysis. Stroke, 32(7), 1520–1524. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.32.7.1520

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free