It is commonly held that “ought implies can.” If so, what constraints does that place on the law? Having provided an argument which allows the maxim to be used by lawyers, I consider the application of that argument to both primary and remedial legal duties. This, it turns out, gives us some reason to reconsider whether the maxim is sound. Further, even if the maxim is sound, it has less purchase on remedial duties than is commonly supposed.
CITATION STYLE
Wilmot-Smith, F. (2023). Law, ‘Ought’,and ‘Can.’ Ethics, 133(4), 529–557. https://doi.org/10.1086/724533
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.