Revisiting the permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC) assay assumptions: POXC is lignin sensitive

  • Woodings F
  • Margenot A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC) is a popular soil health test developed to measure “labile” C via the reduction of permanganate, dependent on several stoichiometric reduction oxidation assumptions. As a proof‐of‐concept experiment to evaluate the interpretation of POXC as “labile” C, we tested 17 compounds ranging in biological lability under standard POXC assay conditions at a fixed C mass (25 mg) in a quartz (2–0.053 mm diameter) matrix. POXC was high for lignin, whereas carbohydrates did not differ from the quartz control. Functional group‐based reactivity partly explained permanganate reduction. These findings indicate that (i) POXC is not a labile C fraction and (ii) corroborate previous concerns that the stoichiometric oxidation–reduction assumptions in the calculation of C oxidation from permanganate reduced are not sound. POXC interpretation should regard POXC as a chemically defined fraction, report in units of moles permanganate reduced per kg soil, and avoid terms such as “labile” and “active.” Indirectly estimated from MnO 4 − reduction, permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC) is regarded as labile C. A total of 17 compounds ranging in biological lability were assessed under standard POXC assay conditions. Lignin reduced MnO 4 − , whereas carbohydrates, such as d‐glucose and d‐sucrose were nonreactive. POXC of compounds was driven by functional group presence, inconsistent with reduction oxidation assumptions. POXC is an indirectly, chemically measured organic matter fraction that should be expressed as MnO 4 − reduced kg −1 .

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Woodings, F. S., & Margenot, A. J. (2023). Revisiting the permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC) assay assumptions: POXC is lignin sensitive. Agricultural & Environmental Letters, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20108

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free