Non-Equilibrium Social Science and Policy

  • Johnson J
  • Ormerod P
  • Rosewell B
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
94Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Between 2011 and 2014 the European Non-Equilibrium Social Science Project (NESS) investigated the place of equilibrium in the social sciences and policy. Orthodox economics is based on an equilibrium view of how the economy functions and does not offer a complete description of how the world operates. However, mainstream economics is not an empty box. Its fundamental insight, that people respond to incentives, may be the only universal law of behaviour in the social sciences. Only economics has used equilibrium as a primary driver of system behaviour, but economics has become much more empirical at the microlevel over the past two decades. This is due to two factors: advances in statistical theory enabling better estimates of policy consequences at the microlevel, and the rise of behavioural economics which looks at how people, firms and governments really do behave in practice. In this context, this chapter briefly reviews the contributions of this book across the social sciences and ends with a discussion of the research themes that act as a roadmap for further research. These include: realistic models of agent behaviour; multilevel systems; policy informatics; narratives and decision making under uncertainty; and validation of agent-based complex systems models.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Johnson, J., Ormerod, P., Rosewell, B., Nowak, A., & Zhang, Y.-C. (2017). Non-Equilibrium Social Science and Policy (pp. 1–17). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42424-8_1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free