Workflow Scheduling in the Cloud with Weighted Upward-Rank Priority Scheme Using Random Walk and Uniform Spare Budget Splitting

10Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We study a difficult problem of how to schedule complex workflows with precedence constraints under a limited budget in the cloud environment. We first formulate the scheduling problem as an integer programming problem, which can be optimized and used as the baseline of performance. We then consider the traditional approach of scheduling jobs in a prioritized order based on the upward-rank of each job. For those jobs with no precedence constraints among themselves, the plain upward-rank priority scheme assigns priorities in an arbitrary way. We propose a job prioritization scheme that uses the Markovian chain stationary probabilities as a measure of the importance of jobs. The scheme keeps the precedence order for the jobs that have precedence constraints between each other and assigns priorities according to the jobs' importance for the jobs without precedence constraints. We finally design a uniform spare budget-splitting strategy that splits the spare budget uniformly across all the jobs. We test our algorithms on a variety of workflows, including the Fast Fourier transform (FFT), the Gaussian elimination, typical scientific workflows, randomly generated workflows, and workflows from an in-production cluster of an online streaming service company. We compare our algorithms with state-of-the-art algorithms. The empirical results show that the uniform spare budget splitting scheme outperforms the splitting scheme in proportion to extra demand on average for most cases, and the Markovian-based prioritization further improves the workflow makespan.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, H., Zheng, X., Xia, Y., & Li, M. (2019). Workflow Scheduling in the Cloud with Weighted Upward-Rank Priority Scheme Using Random Walk and Uniform Spare Budget Splitting. IEEE Access, 7, 60359–60375. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2912652

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free