Multihazard Risk Assessment from Qualitative Methods to Bayesian Networks: Reviewing Recent Contributions and Exploring New Perspectives

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Natural processes are interacting components of natural systems. Under certain circumstances, they can be transformed into threats for humanity, environment, and development. Examples such as the 2006 Pangandaran earthquake–tsunami and the 2011 Tohoku earthquake–tsunami–flood–nuclear catastrophe point out the necessity for an integrated multihazard risk assessment tool. This paper presents the critical steps and improvements in approaches to multihazard risk management. From the first qualitative, semiquantitative techniques with which risk is calculated through individual processes to more powerful techniques which try to capture and evaluate the interactions (trigger, cascade effect) among the natural hazards, such as Event Tree (ET) and Bayesian Networks (BNs). Especially Bayesian Networks and recently, their extensions as Dynamic Bayesian Networks (DBNs) and Hybrid Bayesian Networks (HBNs) offer a great opportunity for a more realistic and flexible multihazard risk assessment.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tsiplakidis, J., & Photis, Y. N. (2019). Multihazard Risk Assessment from Qualitative Methods to Bayesian Networks: Reviewing Recent Contributions and Exploring New Perspectives. In Key Challenges in Geography (Vol. Part F2238, pp. 401–429). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04750-4_21

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free