The objective of this study was to evaluate the viability of using a single test in which cardiorespiratory variables are measured, to establish training guidelines in running and/or cycling training activities. Six triathletes (two females and four males), six runners (two females and four males) and six males cyclists, all with 5.5 years of serious training and still involved in racing, were tested on a treadmill and cycle ergometer. Cardiorespiratory variables [e.g., heart rate (HR), minute ventilation, carbon dioxide output (V̇CO2)] were calculated relative to fixed percentages of maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O(2max); from 50 to 100%). The entire group of subjects had significantly (P < 0.05) higher values of V̇O(2max) on the treadmill compared with the cycle ergometer [mean (SEM) 4.7 (0.8) and 4.4 (0.9) 1.min-1, respectively], and differences between tests averaged 10.5% for runners, 6.1% for triathletes and 2.8% for cyclists. A three-way analysis of variance using a 3 x 2 x 6 design (groups x tests x intensities) demonstrated that all factors yielded highly significant F-ratios (P < 0.05) for all variables between tests, even though differences in HR were only 4 beats.min-1. When HR was plotted against a fixed percentage of V̇O(2max), a high correlation was found between tests. These results demonstrate that for triathletes, cyclists and runners, the relationship between HR and percentage of V̇O(2max), obtained in either a treadmill or a cycle ergometer test, may be used independently of absolute V̇O(2max) to obtain reference HR values that can be used to monitor their running and/or cycling training bouts.
CITATION STYLE
Basset, F. A., & Boulay, M. R. (2000). Specificity of treadmill and cycle ergometer tests in triathletes, runners and cyclists. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 81(3), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004210050033
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.