ILab-Edinburgh at SemEval-2016 task 7: A hybrid approach for determining sentiment intensity of Arabic Twitter phrases

26Citations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper describes the iLab-Edinburgh Sentiment Analysis system, winner of the Arabic Twitter Task 7 in SemEval-2016. The system employs a hybrid approach of supervised learning and rule-based methods to predict a sentiment intensity (SI) score for a given Arabic Twitter phrase. First, the supervised method uses an ensemble of trained linear regression models to produce an initial SI score for each given text instance. Second, the resulting SI score is adjusted using a set of rules that exploit a number of publicly available sentiment lexica. The system demonstrates strong results of 0.536 Kendall score, ranking top in this task.

References Powered by Scopus

Bagging predictors

19182Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines

8111Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis

2587Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A review of sentiment analysis research in Arabic language

178Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sentiment analysis in Arabic: A review of the literature

155Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A comprehensive survey of arabic sentiment analysis

153Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Refaee, E., & Rieser, V. (2016). ILab-Edinburgh at SemEval-2016 task 7: A hybrid approach for determining sentiment intensity of Arabic Twitter phrases. In SemEval 2016 - 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, Proceedings (pp. 474–480). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/s16-1077

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 31

74%

Researcher 5

12%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 38

81%

Linguistics 5

11%

Neuroscience 2

4%

Engineering 2

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free