Automated Contouring and Planning in Radiation Therapy: What Is ‘Clinically Acceptable’?

14Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Developers and users of artificial-intelligence-based tools for automatic contouring and treatment planning in radiotherapy are expected to assess clinical acceptability of these tools. However, what is ‘clinical acceptability’? Quantitative and qualitative approaches have been used to assess this ill-defined concept, all of which have advantages and disadvantages or limitations. The approach chosen may depend on the goal of the study as well as on available resources. In this paper, we discuss various aspects of ‘clinical acceptability’ and how they can move us toward a standard for defining clinical acceptability of new autocontouring and planning tools.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baroudi, H., Brock, K. K., Cao, W., Chen, X., Chung, C., Court, L. E., … Zhao, Y. (2023, February 1). Automated Contouring and Planning in Radiation Therapy: What Is ‘Clinically Acceptable’? Diagnostics. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13040667

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free