The History and Philosophy of Science History

2Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Past science is studied from two perspectives. The intellectual history of science, which focuses on the development of ideas and arguments, and the social history of science, which focuses on the development of science as a social undertaking within its broader contexts, are both alive in the academy. Nevertheless, these two approaches do not interact very well, and the field of science history is bifurcated along these lines. Indeed, intellectual and cultural historians of science tend, basically, to ignore one another. They have different training, different aims, different audiences, and often different institutional homes. Intellectual historians of science tend to be conversant with philosophers, social historians of science associate with mainstream historians, but they do not often discourse with each other. In turn, this has led to remarkable naïveté on each side regarding the work of science historians across the disciplinary fence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miller, D. M. (2012). The History and Philosophy of Science History. In Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science (Vol. 263, pp. 29–48). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1745-9_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free