A comparative study of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms to optimize the selection of investment portfolios with cardinality constraints

5Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We consider the problem of selecting investment components according to two partially opposed measures: the portfolio performance and its risk. We approach this within Markowitz's model, considering the case of mutual funds market in Europe until July 2010. Comparisons were made on three multi-objective evolutionary algorithms, namely NSGA-II, SPEA2 and IBEA. Two well-known performance measures are considered for this purpose: hypervolume and R 2 indicator. The comparative analysis also includes an assessment of the financial efficiency of the investment portfolio selected according to Sharpe's index, which is a measure of performance/risk. The experimental results hint at the superiority of the indicator-based evolutionary algorithm. © 2012 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Colomine Duran, F. E., Cotta, C., & Fernández-Leiva, A. J. (2012). A comparative study of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms to optimize the selection of investment portfolios with cardinality constraints. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 7248 LNCS, pp. 165–173). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29178-4_17

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free