Classification of Pediatric Supracondylar Fractures: Comparison between the Gartland and the Lagrange & Rigault Classifications

  • Grazina R
  • Oliveira M
  • Marinhas J
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background The supracondylar fracture of the humerus is one of the most common fractures in pediatric age. Many classifications were proposed, with Gartland being the most widely used one and Lagrange and Rigault (L&R) the most used in French-speaking countries.Objectives The goal of this study was to compare the Wilkins-modified Gartland classification with the L&R classification in terms of reproducibility.Methods Three observers with similar training levels classified 35 fractures according to both classifications twice to evaluate both intra and interobserver variation.Results The mean intraobserver variation was 0.78 and 0.77 for Gartland and L&R classifications, respectively, and the mean interobserver variation was 0.55 and 0.62 for Gartland and L&R classifications, respectively.Conclusions Both classifications reveal adequate to usage in clinical and investigational practices, which is consistent with the literature.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grazina, R., Oliveira, M., Marinhas, J., Ferreira, A., Costa, A., Rodrigues, D., & Santos, M. (2018). Classification of Pediatric Supracondylar Fractures: Comparison between the Gartland and the Lagrange & Rigault Classifications. Revista Iberoamericana de Cirugía de La Mano, 46(02), 113–116. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1675427

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free