Taking a Proposal Seriously: Orientations to Agenda and Agency in Support Workers’ Responses to Client Proposals

  • Stevanovic M
  • Lindholm C
  • Valkeapää T
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

While joint decision-making is regularly launched by a proposal, it is the recipients’ responses that crucially influence the proposal outcome. This chapter examines how support workers respond to the proposals made by clients during rehabilitation group meetings at the Clubhouse. Drawing on a collection of 180 client-initiated proposal sequences, the paper describes two dilemmas that the support workers face when seeking to take client proposals 'seriously.' The first concerns the meeting’s agenda and consists of a tension between providing recognition for the individual client and encouraging collective participation. The second dilemma has to do with agency and consists of a tension between focusing on the client as the originator of the proposal and avoiding treating him or her alone accountable for it. The analysis of these dilemmas contributes to a deeper understanding of group decision-making, in general, while these findings have specific relevance in mental health rehabilitation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stevanovic, M., Lindholm, C., Valkeapää, T., Valkia, K., & Weiste, E. (2020). Taking a Proposal Seriously: Orientations to Agenda and Agency in Support Workers’ Responses to Client Proposals. In Joint Decision Making in Mental Health (pp. 141–164). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43531-8_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free