Numerical Modelling of Soft Soil Improvement Using Expanded Polystyrene Geofoam for Road Embankment

  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Soft soil brings abundant engineering issues due to low bearing capacity and shear strength. A comprehensive study of soft ground needs to be reviewed and identified before construction can start. Various techniques can be used to improve the soil. However, this study focuses on using material namely expanded polystyrene. The geotextile is embedded with expanded polystyrene to strengthen the soil condition. This study adopted the soil parameters from East Coast Expressway. There are two models in this study, which are earth embankment and EPS embankment. The settlement of the earth embankment is compared with the EPS embankment after construction. The Mohr-Coulomb parameters are used to model the soft soil and embankments, while the linear elastic parameters were adopted to model the EPS and geotextile. This study produced two embankment models, the conventional embankment models with and without surcharge. The second model is an EPS embankment with various densities (22 kg/m3, 29 kg/m3, and 39 kg/m3). The settlement is recorded for ten years after the embankment construction was completed. The difference settlement value for the conventionalmodel is 28mm. The settlement value for EPS 22 is 3.18mm, EPS 29 is 2.06mm, and EPS 39 is 1.51mm. For the geotextile embedded in EPS, the settlement for EPS 22 is 3.17mm, EPS 29 is 2.04mm, and EPS 39 is 1.49mmrespectively. Since EPS uses three different densities, from the prediction of PLAXIS 2D, the higher density gives the lower value of the settlement. However, when the geotextile is embedded with EPS, there is no significant difference in settlement behaviour. In conclusion, the model with a surcharge gives a lower settlement than themodel without a surcharge. But the expanded polystyrene block is the best model to reduce the settlement compared with the conventional model with a surcharge. Different densities of EPS resulted in different settlement value, and EPS 39 gives the lowest settlement value. In terms of the geotextile embedded with EPS, it does not give a significant change in settlement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abu Talib, Z. (2022). Numerical Modelling of Soft Soil Improvement Using Expanded Polystyrene Geofoam for Road Embankment. Journal of Sustainable Underground Exploration, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.30880/jsue.2022.02.01.007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free