What drives political commitment for nutrition? A review and framework synthesis to inform the United Nations Decade of Action on Nutrition

127Citations
Citations of this article
285Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Generating country-level political commitment will be critical to driving forward action throughout the United Nations Decade of Action on Nutrition (2016-2025). In this review of the empirical nutrition policy literature, we ask: what factors generate, sustain and constrain political commitment for nutrition, how and under what circumstances? Our aim is to inform strategic 'commitment-building' actions. Method: We adopted a framework synthesis method and realist review protocol. An initial framework was derived from relevant theory and then populated with empirical evidence to test and modify it. Five steps were undertaken: initial theoretical framework development; search for relevant empirical literature; study selection and quality appraisal; data extraction, analysis and synthesis and framework modification. Results: 75 studies were included. We identified 18 factors that drive commitment, organised into five categories: actors; institutions; political and societal contexts; knowledge, evidence and framing; and, capacities and resources. Irrespective of country-context, effective nutrition actor networks, strong leadership, civil society mobilisation, supportive political administrations, societal change and focusing events, cohesive and resonant framing, and robust data systems and available evidence were commitment drivers. Low-income and middle-income country studies also frequently reported international actors, empowered institutions, vertical coordination and capacities and resources. In upper-middle-income and high-income country studies, private sector interference frequently undermined commitment. Conclusion: Political commitment is not something that simply exists or emerges accidentally; it can be created and strengthened over time through strategic action. Successfully generating commitment will likely require a core set of actions with some context-dependent adaptations. Ultimately, it will necessitate strategic actions by cohesive, resourced and strongly led nutrition actor networks that are responsive to the multifactorial, multilevel and dynamic political systems in which they operate and attempt to influence. Accelerating the formation and effectiveness of such networks over the Nutrition Decade should be a core task for all actors involved.

References Powered by Scopus

Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: A pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19.2 million participants

4093Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Realist review - A new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions

2015Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: A critical review

1337Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The Global Syndemic of Obesity, Undernutrition, and Climate Change: The Lancet Commission report

1773Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A future for the world's children? A WHO–UNICEF–Lancet Commission

669Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ultra-processed foods and the nutrition transition: Global, regional and national trends, food systems transformations and political economy drivers

596Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baker, P., Hawkes, C., Wingrove, K., Demaio, A. R., Parkhurst, J., Thow, A. M., & Walls, H. (2018, January 1). What drives political commitment for nutrition? A review and framework synthesis to inform the United Nations Decade of Action on Nutrition. BMJ Global Health. BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000485

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 100

65%

Researcher 30

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 17

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 43

34%

Nursing and Health Professions 37

30%

Medicine and Dentistry 25

20%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20

16%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 44

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free