Reliable quantification of microplastic release from the domestic laundry of textile fabrics

35Citations
Citations of this article
105Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study explores the significant variation in test methods used to quantify microplastic release from the domestic laundry of textile fabrics. A wide review of the existing methods is made, with the important characteristics of these methods identified and assessed. This includes reviewing the type of washing apparatus, filtration methods, quantification metrics and the influence of fabric samples on the reported release of microplastics from domestic laundry. Based on this review, a new method for the quantification of microplastic release was developed using existing textile testing equipment. The reliability of the method to consistently assess microplastic release was validated through an inter laboratory study involving 10 independent globally distributed laboratories and a filter efficacy in excess of 99% demonstrated. The study showed the method has good inter and intra laboratory qualities, thus indicating this method can be considered robust and reliable. Importantly the method has the potential to provide a standardised method to allow direct comparison of results for different laboratories and for different fabrics with a high level of confidence.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

26Citations
70Readers

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tiffin, L., Hazlehurst, A., Sumner, M., & Taylor, M. (2022). Reliable quantification of microplastic release from the domestic laundry of textile fabrics. Journal of the Textile Institute, 113(4), 558–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2021.1892305

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 28

62%

Researcher 11

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 12

40%

Engineering 7

23%

Chemistry 6

20%

Materials Science 5

17%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 7

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0