Validation of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Based on Item Response Theory

6Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) is a widely used scale for the assessment of the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). We previously developed a novel dementia scale, the ABC dementia scale, in the TRIAD1412 trial and we compared the BPSD domain scores with the NPI scores. We, therefore, considered that we should investigate the quality of the NPI items using statistical approaches. Objective: We investigated the statistical characteristics of the 12 questions or items in the Japanese version of the NPI using the item response theory. This theory is the standard approach for the development of a new assessment scale and we used it to evaluate the quality of the items in the NPI. Methods: First, we performed factor analysis with Promax rotation to identify latent constructs in the data from 312 patients obtained in TRIAD1412. Second, following the result of the factor analysis, we divided the 12 items into domains and then investigated the characteristics of the sub-syndromes in each domain using item response category characteristic curves. Results: We found three latent constructs or domains: 'hyperactivity,' 'psychosis and apathy,' and 'affect' (Cronbach's =0.68) in the 12 items. Further, the items on euphoria, apathy, and appetite and eating abnormalities did not provide sufficient information to estimate BPSD severity. Conclusion: The NPI item characteristics indicate that while the scale can distinguish whether patients have severe BPSD or not, it cannot estimate the degree of severity in a suspected case with a mild or unknown level of BPSD.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wada-Isoe, K., Kikuchi, T., Umeda-Kameyama, Y., Mori, T., Akishita, M., & Nakamura, Y. (2020). Validation of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Based on Item Response Theory. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease Reports, 4(1), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.3233/ADR-200172

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free