Engaging participants in a complex intervention trial in Australian General Practice

21Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. The paper examines the key issues experienced in recruiting and retaining practice involvement in a large complex intervention trial in Australian General Practice. Methods. Reflective notes made by research staff and telephone interviews with staff from general practices which expressed interest, took part or withdrew from a trial of a complex general practice intervention. Results. Recruitment and retention difficulties were due to factors inherent in the demands and context of general practice, the degree of engagement of primary care organisations (Divisions of General Practice), perceived benefits by practices, the design of the trial and the timing and complexity of data collection. Conclusion. There needs to be clearer articulation to practices of the benefits of the research to participants and streamlining of the design and processes of data collection and intervention to fit in with their work practices. Ultimately deeper engagement may require additional funding and ongoing participation through practice research networks. Trial Registration. Current Controlled Trials ACTRN12605000788673. © 2008 Perkins et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Perkins, D., Harris, M. F., Tan, J., Christl, B., Taggart, J., & Fanaian, M. (2008). Engaging participants in a complex intervention trial in Australian General Practice. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-55

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free