On maintenance models in severely and long-term limited membrane bioreactor cultivations

10Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Membrane bioreactors (MBRs) are combinations of common bioreactors and membrane separation units for biomass retention. Through increased biomass concentration, they allow increased productivity (or smaller reactor volume, respectively). Besides high biomass concentrations, operation at very low growth rates is typical for MBRs. In this regime, maintenance metabolism where substrate uptake only yields energy for cell survival becomes of higher importance than in processes run at higher growth rates. While thermodynamically based correlations for the prediction of maintenance coefficients are available for chemostat or other medium growth rate processes, some authors have mentioned a change in energy demand in MBRs and a dependence of maintenance parameters on operating conditions. Due to the fact that often mixed cultures are used and resulting from the different evaluation methods used by different authors, views on the possible influences on maintenance parameters differ. However, it is accepted that common models describing microbial growth and production of metabolites or degradation of pollutants do not consider the effects caused by severe limitations and therefore cannot sufficiently be applied to MBRs. In this study, maintenance parameters were determined for a model organism (Ustilago maydis) and results from different evaluation methods were compared. A continuous fit of respiration data gave more consistent results than the traditional method of plotting specific uptake versus growth rate. They suggest that below μ = 10% μmax the maintenance coefficient drops to a third of the value in short-term limited cultures. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Drews, A., & Kraume, M. (2007). On maintenance models in severely and long-term limited membrane bioreactor cultivations. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 96(5), 892–903. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.21211

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free