Maternal folate status during extended lactation and the effect of supplemental folic acid

68Citations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Folate requirements during lactation are not well established. Objective: We assessed the effects of dietary and supplemental folate intakes during extended lactation. Design: Lactating women (n = 42) were enrolled in a doubleblind, randomized, longitudinal supplementation trial and received either 0 or 1 mg folic acid/d. At 3 and 6 mo postpartum, maternal folate status was assessed by measuring erythrocyte, plasma, milk, and dietary folate concentrations; plasma homocysteine; and hematologic indexes. Infant anthropometric measures of growth, milk intake, and folate intake were also assessed. Results: In supplemented women, values at 6 mo for erythrocyte and milk folate concentrations and for plasma homocysteine were not significantly different from those at 3 mo. In supplemented women compared with unsupplemented women at 6 mo, values for erythrocyte folate (840 compared with 667 nmol/L; P < 0.05), hemoglobin (140 compared with 134 g/L; P < 0.02), and hematocrit (0.41 compared with 0.39; P < 0.02) were higher and values for reticulocytes were lower. In unsupplemented women, milk folate declined from 224 to 187 nmol/L (99 to 82 ng/mL), whereas plasma homocysteine increased from 6.7 to 7.4 μmol/L. Dietary folate intake was not significantly different between groups (380 ± 19 μg/d) and at 6 mo was correlated with plasma homocysteine in unsupplemented women (r = -0.53, P < 0.01) and with plasma folate in supplemented women (r = 0.49, P < 0.02). Conclusions: A dietary folate intake of ≃380 μg/d may not be sufficient to prevent mobilization of maternal folate stores during lactation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mackey, A. D., & Picciano, M. F. (1999). Maternal folate status during extended lactation and the effect of supplemental folic acid. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 69(2), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/69.2.285

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free