Towards systemic evaluation in turbulent times – Second-order practice shift

11Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The need for, and possibilities of, a second-order shift in evaluation practice are explored. Second-order evaluation practice enables an evaluator to improve practice as a skilled practitioner, acknowledging her embeddedness within an evaluand. The article explores evaluation practice as experienced by professional evaluators, using ideas from developmental evaluation coupled with systemic evaluation in the tradition of systems thinking in practice. Systemic evaluation aims to capture systemic sensibilities – the bigger picture – of complex turbulent situations of change underpinning evaluands. Attributes of second-order practice with systemic evaluation are understood as being aligned with both systemic and systematic modes of evaluation praxis. Personal experiences are provided where this juxtaposing praxis has been found wanting. By example, a systems thinking in practice framework is explored as heuristic support for making a second-order practice shift. The article concludes with a discussion of some implications for developments in professionalising evaluation practice and research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schmidt-Abbey, B., Reynolds, M., & Ison, R. (2020). Towards systemic evaluation in turbulent times – Second-order practice shift. Evaluation, 26(2), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389020909120

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free