Randomized clinical trial of single- versus multiple-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis in gastric cancer surgery

56Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The optimum duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis in elective gastric cancer surgery is still open to question. This multicentre randomized clinical trial compared a single-dose with a multiple-dose regimen of antimicrobial prophylaxis for prevention of surgical-site infection. Methods: Between May 2001 and December 2004, 501 patients undergoing elective surgery for gastric cancer in ten centres were allocated randomly to single- or multiple-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of surgical-site infection, analysed by intention to treat. Results: Some 243 patients who received a single dose and 243 who received multiple doses of antibiotics were included in the final analysis. The surgical-site infection rate was 9.5 per cent (23 of 243) and 8.6 per cent (21 of 243) respectively (difference 0.9 (95 per cent confidence interval -4.3 to 5.9) per cent). Antimicrobial prophylaxis had no major adverse effects. Conclusion: The incidence of surgical-site infection in elective gastric cancer surgery was similar with both antibiotic prophylaxis regimens. Copyright © 2007 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mohri, Y., Tonouchi, H., Kobayashi, M., Nakai, K., & Kusunoki, M. (2007). Randomized clinical trial of single- versus multiple-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis in gastric cancer surgery. British Journal of Surgery, 94(6), 683–688. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5837

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free