Optimizing clinical use of biomarkers in high-risk acute heart failure patients

79Citations
Citations of this article
95Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim The clinical value of single biomarkers at single time-points to predict outcomes in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) is limited. We performed a multimarker, multi-time-point analysis of biomarkers for the prediction of post-discharge clinical outcomes in high-risk AHF patients. Methods and results A set of 48 circulating biomarkers were measured in the PROTECT trial which enrolled 2033 patients with AHF. Associations between baseline levels of biomarkers and outcomes (30-day all-cause mortality, 30-day death or rehospitalization for renal/cardiovascular causes and 180-day all-cause mortality) were evaluated. Prognostic accuracies of baseline, days 2 or 3, 7, and 14 biomarker measurements were estimated and compared utilizing a time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) analysis. Forty-four biomarkers were significantly associated with outcomes, but 42 had limited prognostic value (C-index < 0.70). However, multimarker models combining best-performing biomarkers from different clusters had a much stronger prognostic value. Combining blood urea nitrogen (BUN), chloride, interleukin (IL)-6, cTnI, sST-2 and VEGFR-1 into a clinical model yielded a 11% increase in C-index to 0.84 and 0.78 for 30-day and 180-day all-cause mortality, respectively, and cNRI of 0.86 95% CI [0.55-1.11] and 0.76 95% CI [0.57-0.87]. Prognostic gain was modest for the 30-day death/rehospitalization for cardiovascular or renal causes endpoint. Comparative time-dependent AUC analysis indicated that late measurements provided superior accuracy for the prediction of all-cause mortality over 180 days, with few exceptions including BUN and galectin-3. However, the predictive value of most biomarkers showed a diminishing pattern over time irrespective of moment of measurement. Conclusions Multimarker models significantly improve risk prediction. Subsequent measurements, beyond admission, are needed for majority of biomarkers to maximize prognostic value over time, particularly in the long term.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Demissei, B. G., Valente, M. A. E., Cleland, J. G., O’Connor, C. M., Metra, M., Ponikowski, P., … Voors, A. A. (2016). Optimizing clinical use of biomarkers in high-risk acute heart failure patients. European Journal of Heart Failure, 18(3), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.443

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free