Mapping State Responsibility for Complicity in Extraordinary Rendition

  • Egan S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In addition to the difficulties involved in establishing the facts of complicity in extraordinary rendition, a further challenge encountered by victims and human rights groups has been that of establishing legal responsibility on the part of European States for facilitating implementation of the CIA's Detention and Interrogation Programme. In seeking to understand the applicable legal principles, the chapter first explores the rules of State responsibility for complicity in wrongful acts as they have been framed within the overarching context of international law (ARSIWA) and in international human rights law. It concludes that human rights bodies, in particular the ECtHRts, have begun to apply an imputational, risk-based rule of State responsibility for complicity that is clearly wider than the traditional approach expressed in ARSIWA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Egan, S. (2019). Mapping State Responsibility for Complicity in Extraordinary Rendition. In Extraordinary Rendition and Human Rights (pp. 75–118). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04122-9_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free