Studying Online Contents Navigation: A Comparison Between Eye-Tracking Technique and Self-Reported Investigation

  • Marchiori E
  • Cantoni L
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study posits that an eye-tracking approach, together with a self-reported research design, represent valid alternatives to study tourism-related web browsing behavior. Users might form their idea about a future vacation and/or about a destination from the contents presented online, which are based on relatively impersonal textual resources provided by other users. Thus, the ability to evaluate what prospective customers are looking at in online contexts represents a new way to enhance the promotion of a destination. An eye-tracking technique was therefore compared with the results gathered from a previous study which considered a user test with self-declaration of which features on the pages capture users' attention the most. Results of this study assess the presence of a common recognition by untrained users of the dominant topic and sentiment expressed on tourism related social media pages. The results obtained from both user tests performed in different research settings revealed also potential biases in data interpretation if only one technique is used.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marchiori, E., & Cantoni, L. (2015). Studying Online Contents Navigation: A Comparison Between Eye-Tracking Technique and Self-Reported Investigation. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2015 (pp. 349–359). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14343-9_26

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free