Etiological agents of bacterial sepsis in a newly constructed medical center in Saint Petersburg, Russia

  • Barantsevich E
  • Barantsevich N
  • Rybkova N
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction Sepsis is one of the factors of high mortality in ICUs in critically ill patients. Annual mortality from this condition is estimated at 30 to 50 deaths per 100,000 population [1,2,4,5]. The aim of the present study was to reveal the spectrum and resistance to antibiotics of microorganisms, causing sepsis in hospitalized patients of the multidisciplinary medical center, that accumulates patients from all regions of Russia, during the fi rst year from its foundation, with low possibility of local nosocomial strains formation. Methods The diagnosis of sepsis was verifi ed by isolation of bacteria from blood (only two or more positive results were considered) and the presence of two or more criteria of systemic infl ammatory response syndrome [3]. The cultures were isolated from blood with BactAlert (BioMerieux, France). The identification was performed by routine phenotypic methods and sequencing of the 16sRNA gene (ABI Prism 3130, MicroSeq ID v2.0 Software, MicroSeq ID 16s rDNA500 Library v2.0). Resistance to routinely used antibiotics was investigated with the disc diff usion method and by dilution techniques for MIC determination on Muller-Hinton agar (Oxoid, UK). Results Sepsis, associated with bloodstream infections, was revealed in 89 cases - Gram-positive cocci predominated. Staphylococcus spp. were responsible for 35 (39.3%) cases: Staphylococcus aureus was the causative agent in eight (8.9%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Staphylococcus hominis novobiosepticus) in 27 (30.3%) infections. Other Grampositive cocci were Enterococcus faecalis in eight (8.9%), Enterococcus faecium in six (6.7%). Gram-negative microorganisms included Acinetobacter baumannii that was found in 11 (12.4%), Klebsiella spp. (Klebsiella pneumonia, Klebsiella rhinoscleromatis, Klebsiella oxytoca) in fi ve (5.6%), Escherichia coli in eight (8.9%), Enterobacter spp. (Enterobacter cloaceae, Enterobacter aerogenes, Enterobacter hormaechea) in three (3.4%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa in two (2.2%) patients with sepsis. Rarely isolated bacteria were Bacillus thuringiensis in one (1.1%), Stenotrophomonas maltophylia in one (1.1%), Pantoeae agglomerans in one (1.1%), Corynebacterium mucifaciensis in one (1.1%) case. Two and more species were isolated from blood in seven (7.9%) patients. In total, 105 strains were isolated in sepsis cases. Resistance to antibiotics was observed in 96 (91.4%) bacterial isolates; 56 (53.3%) were multidrugresistant strains. All E. faecium, and nine (81.8%) strains of A. baumannii were resistant to seven or more antibiotics. All E. faecium strains were susceptible to linezolide, A. baumannii to tigecycline. Methicillin resistance was detected in two (15.4%) strains of S. aureus and 18 (60.0%) strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci; four (66.7%) strains of E. faecium were vancomycin resistant. Conclusion Gram-positive bacteria were the leading causative agents of sepsis, associated with bloodstream infections in the newlyconstructed hospital in Saint Petersburg. The majority of strains (91.4%) were resistant to antibiotics, and more than half of the isolates were multidrug resistant. Methicillin resistance was observed predominantly in coagulase-negative staphylococci, vancomycin resistance in E. faecium. All polyresistant E. faecium strains were susceptible to linezolide, A. baumannii to tigecycline.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barantsevich, E., Barantsevich, N., Rybkova, N., Churkina, I., Pestova, N., & Karpenko, M. (2011). Etiological agents of bacterial sepsis in a newly constructed medical center in Saint Petersburg, Russia. Critical Care, 15(S3). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10414

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free