An attempt to calibrate the UHF strato-tropospheric radar at Arecibo using NexRad radar and disdrometer data

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to present a methodology to calibrate the reflectivity of the UHF Strato-Tropospheric (ST) radar located at NAIC in Puerto Rico. The UHF lower relevant altitude is at 5.9 km, the melting layer being at around 4.8 km. The data used for the calibration came from the observations of clouds, carried out with Strato-Tropospheric dual-wavelength (UHF and VHF) radars and a disdrometer; those instruments being located on the NAIC site in Arecibo, Puerto Rico. The National Weather Service operates other instruments like the radiosondes and the NexRad Radar in other sites. The proposed method proceeds in two steps. The first consists of the comparison between the NexRad reflectivity and the reflectivity computed from the drop size distributions measured by the disdrometer for one day with a noticeable rainfall rate. In spite of the distance of both instruments, the agreement between the reflectivities of both instruments is enough good to be used as a reference for the UHF ST radar. The errors relative at each data set is found to be 2.75 dB for the disdrometer and 4 dB for the NexRad radar, following the approach of Hocking et al. (2001). The inadequacy between the two sampled volume is an important contribution in the errors. The second step consists of the comparison between the NexRad radar reflectivity and the UHF non-calibrated reflectivity at the 4 altitudes of common observations during one event on 15 October 1998. Similar features are observed and a coefficient is deduced. An offset around 4.7 dB is observed and the correlation factor lies between 0.628 and 0.730. According to the errors of the data sets, the precision on the calibration is of the order of 2 dB. This method works only when there are precipitation hydrometeors above the NAIC site. However, the result of the calibration could be applied to other data obtained during the campaign, the only constraint being the same value of the transmitter power. © European Geosciences Union 2004.

Figures

  • Table 1. Geographical coordinates of the different instruments.
  • Table 2. For an horizontal distance of 76 km from the NexRad radar, in the vertical direction above the NAIC site and as a function of the VCP11 elevation: H: Height of the central beam above NAIC, Z (MSL): altitude of the NexRad central beam above the NAIC site, taking into account the NexRad altitude, BW (km) the vertical size of the beamwidth, DZ (km) the distance between two consecutive central beams.
  • Table 3. Mean values of the distance and azimuth between the NexRad radar et and the other instruments, disdrometer and UHF radar.
  • Fig. 1. Horizontal display of the NexRad reflectivity (dBZ) in color scale at an elevation of 0.4◦ observed in the northwest quadrant at different lifetimes of the clouds.
  • Fig. 2. Time evolution of rainfall rate, R, and mass weighted mean diameter, Dm, and reflectivity, on 15 October 1998 between 18:20 and 21:00 UT.
  • Fig. 3. UHF Strato-tropospheric radar: the lower plot represents the relative reflectivity in color scale (relative dB) as a function of altitude and time; the upper plot represents the Doppler velocity in the vertical beam in color scale (m/s) as a function of altitude and time; positive values correspond to upward motion.
  • Fig. 4. Sketch to represent relative locations of the disdrometer and the NexRad radar beam.
  • Fig. 5. (a) Time variation of the disdrometer and NexRad radar reflectivities on 15 October 1998: Solid line and diamond: reflectivity computed by using drop size distribution measured by the disdrometer. Star: Reflectivity measured by the NexRad radar. (b) NexRad reflectivity as a function of the disdrometer reflectivity.

References Powered by Scopus

Ein Spektrograph für Niederschlagstropfen mit automatischer Auswertung

392Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Recording, archiving, and using WSR-88D data

206Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The shape of averaged drop size distributions

153Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kafando, P., & Petitdidier, M. (2004). An attempt to calibrate the UHF strato-tropospheric radar at Arecibo using NexRad radar and disdrometer data. Annales Geophysicae, 22(12), 4025–4034. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-22-4025-2004

Readers over time

‘10‘12‘13‘14‘16‘17‘18‘1901234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 4

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

38%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Physics and Astronomy 2

29%

Engineering 2

29%

Environmental Science 2

29%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0