Preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate as a significant predictor of long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting in Japanese patients

12Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purposes: The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the effect of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and to determine whether preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) can be a predictor of long-term outcomes after CABG. Methods: 486 Japanese patients who underwent isolated CABG between December 2000 and August 2010 were evaluated. Preoperative eGFR was estimated by the Japanese equation according to guidelines from the Japanese Society of Nephrology. We defined CKD as a preoperative eGFR of less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m2. 203 patients had CKD (CK group) and 283 patients did not (N group). Results: During a mean observation time of 53 months, the overall survival rate was significantly lower in the CK group than in the N group (p = 0.0044). Similarly, the CK group had significantly more unfavorable results with regard to freedom from cardiac death, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), and hemodialysis. Using multivariate analyses, preoperative eGFR was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (HR 0.983; p = 0.026), cardiac mortality (HR 0.963; p = 0.006), and incidence of MACCE (HR 0.983; p = 0.002). Conclusions: The CK group had significantly more unfavorable outcomes than the N group. Preoperative eGFR was an independent predictor of long-term outcomes after CABG in Japanese patients. © 2013 The Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Domoto, S., Tagusari, O., Nakamura, Y., Takai, H., Seike, Y., Ito, Y., … Shikata, F. (2014). Preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate as a significant predictor of long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting in Japanese patients. General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 62(2), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-013-0306-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free