Fitting dynamic regression models to seshat data

20Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article presents a general statistical approach suitable for the analysis of time-resolved (time-series) cross-cultural data. The goal is to test theories about the evolutionary processes that generate cultural change. This approach allows us to investigate the effects of predictor variables (proxying for theory-suggested mechanisms), while controlling for spatial diffusion and autocorrelations due to shared cultural history (known as Galton's Problem). It also Cits autoregressive terms to account for serial correlations in the data and tests for nonlinear effects. I illustrate these ideas and methods with an analysis of processes that may inCluence the evolution of one component of social complexity, information systems, using the Seshat: Global History Databank.

References Powered by Scopus

Fluctuations in the abundance of a species considered mathematically

1566Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How deep are the roots of economic development?

402Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Understanding early civilizations: A comparative study

388Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Complex societies precede moralizing gods throughout world history

119Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Disentangling the evolutionary drivers of social complexity: A comprehensive test of hypotheses

33Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Scale and information-processing thresholds in Holocene social evolution

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Turchin, P. (2018). Fitting dynamic regression models to seshat data. Cliodynamics, 9(1), 25–58. https://doi.org/10.21237/C7clio9137696

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

64%

Researcher 3

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 3

33%

Social Sciences 2

22%

Physics and Astronomy 2

22%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

22%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 4
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 19

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0