Tracking machine learning models for pandemic scenarios: a systematic review of machine learning models that predict local and global evolution of pandemics

3Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This systematic review aims to study and classify machine learning models that predict pandemics’ evolution within affected regions or countries. The advantage of this systematic review is that it allows the health authorities to decide what prediction model fits best depending upon the region’s criticality and optimize hospitals’ approaches to preparing and anticipating patient care. We searched ACM Digital Library, Biomed Central, BioRxiv+MedRxiv, BMJ, Computers and Applied Sciences, IEEEXplore, JMIR Medical Informatics, Medline Daily Updates, Nature, Oxford Academic, PubMed, Sage Online, ScienceDirect, Scopus, SpringerLink, Web of Science, and Wiley Online Library between 1 January 2020 and 31 July 2022. We divided the interventions into similarities between cumulative COVID-19 real cases and machine learning prediction models’ ability to track pandemics trending. We included 45 studies that rated low to high risk of bias. The standardized mean differences (SMD) for the two groups were 0.18, 95% CI, with interval of [0.01, 0.35], I2=0, and p value=0.04. We built a taxonomic analysis of the included studies and determined two domains: pandemics trending prediction models and geolocation tracking models. We performed the meta-analysis and data synthesis and got low publication bias because of missing results. The level of certainty varied from very low to high. By submitting the 45 studies on the risk of bias, the levels of certainty, the summary of findings, and the statistical analysis via the forest and funnel plots assessments, we could determine the satisfactory statistical significance homogeneity across the included studies to simulate the progress of the pandemics and help the healthcare authorities to take preventive decisions.

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

53614Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

46644Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement

17664Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A multistate model and its standalone tool to predict hospital and ICU occupancy by patients with COVID-19

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Discovering new interaction between genes in extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma using Bayesian networks

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Trends and factors associated with daily number of new cases of COVID-19 in the early stage of the pandemic: A worldwide opendata study

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Palermo, M. B., Policarpo, L. M., Costa, C. A. da, & Righi, R. da R. (2022, December 1). Tracking machine learning models for pandemic scenarios: a systematic review of machine learning models that predict local and global evolution of pandemics. Network Modeling Analysis in Health Informatics and Bioinformatics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13721-022-00384-0

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

79%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

11%

Researcher 2

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 13

72%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 3

17%

Philosophy 1

6%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 4

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free