Mechanisms, Then and Now: From Metaphysics to Practice

2Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

For many old and new mechanists, Mechanism is both a metaphysical position and a thesis about scientific methodology. In this paper we discuss the relation between the metaphysics of mechanisms and the role of mechanical explanation in the practice of science, by presenting and comparing the key tenets of Old and New Mechanism. First, by focusing on the case of gravity, we show how the metaphysics of Old Mechanism constrained scientific explanation, and discuss Newton’s critique of Old Mechanism. Second, we examine the current mechanistic metaphysics, arguing that it is not warranted by the use of the concept of mechanism in scientific practice, and motivate a thin conception of mechanism (the truly minimal view), according to which mechanisms are causal pathways for a certain effect or phenomenon. Finally, we draw analogies between Newton’s critique of Old Mechanism and our thesis that the metaphysical commitments of New Mechanism are not necessary in order to illuminate scientific practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Psillos, S., & Ioannidis, S. (2019). Mechanisms, Then and Now: From Metaphysics to Practice. In European Studies in Philosophy of Science (Vol. 11, pp. 11–31). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10707-9_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free