Measuring quality.

4Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

It is no longer sufficient for health care professionals to provide high quality health care, they must also be able to demonstrate that they are meeting and often exceeding quality targets. Quality indicators (QIs) provide a means of measuring and assessing quality, however there are advantages and disadvantages of indicator measurement. Further, the clinical perspective needs to be balanced against managerial control when developing valid, reliable, sensitive and specific QIs. While indicators do not represent a perfect measurement device, they may provide a useful tool for improving patient safety and meeting community expectations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Willis, C. D., Evans, S. M., Stoelwinder, J. U., & Cameron, P. A. (2007). Measuring quality. Australian Health Review : A Publication of the Australian Hospital Association, 31(2), 276–281. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH070276

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free