Factors influencing patient willingness to participate in genetic research after a myocardial infarction

20Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Achieving 'personalized medicine' requires enrolling representative cohorts into genetic studies, but patient self-selection may introduce bias. We sought to identify characteristics associated with genetic consent in a myocardial infarction (MI) registry.Methods: We assessed correlates of participation in the genetic sub-study of TRIUMPH, a prospective MI registry (n = 4,340) from 24 US hospitals between April 2005 and December 2008. Factors examined included extensive socio-demographics factors, clinical variables, and study site. Predictors of consent were identified using hierarchical modified Poisson regression, adjusting for study site. Variation in consent rates across hospitals were quantified by the median rate ratio (MRR).Results: Most subjects consented to donation of their genetic material (n = 3,484; 80%). Participation rates varied greatly between sites, from 40% to 100%. After adjustment for confounding factors, the MRR for hospital was 1.22 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11 to 1.29). The only patient-level factors associated with consent were race (RR 0.93 for African Americans versus whites, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.99) and body mass index (RR 1.03 for BMI ≥ 25, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.06).Conclusion: Among patients with an MI there were notable differences in genetic consent by study site, but little association with patient-level factors. This suggests that variation in the way information is presented during recruitment, or other site factors, strongly influence patients' decision to participate in genetic studies. © 2011 Lanfear et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Figures

  • Table 1 Patient characteristics in genetic sub-study participants versus non-participants
  • Table 1 Patient characteristics in genetic sub-study participants versus non-participants (Continued)
  • Figure 1 Genetic consent rates by hospital. Each hospital is labeled by letters A to H (vertical axis). Each dot and line represents the proportion of subjects at the site that consented to genetic sub-study enrollment. The central dot shows the point estimate of the site rate (percentage) generated from the random effects models. The lines extending from the dot represent the 95% confidence interval.
  • Figure 2 Multivariable model of participation in genetic sub-study. Variables included in the model are shown along the vertical axis. The strength of effect is shown along the horizontal axis with the vertical dotted line demarking a rate ratio of 1 (that is, no effect); estimates to the right (that is, > 1) are associated with greater likelihood of genetic consent while those to the left (that is, < 1) indicate association with reduced likelihood of genetic consent. Each dot and line represents the point estimate of the effect of that variable in the model, while the line shows the 95% confidence interval. CVA, Cerebral Vascular Accident; HCT, hematocrit; PHQ, Patient Health Questionnaire; SF-12 PCS, short form 12 physical component score.

References Powered by Scopus

7338Citations
2291Readers

This article is free to access.

Get full text

This article is free to access.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Get full text

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lanfear, D. E., Jones, P. G., Cresci, S., Tang, F., Rathore, S. S., & Spertus, J. A. (2011). Factors influencing patient willingness to participate in genetic research after a myocardial infarction. Genome Medicine, 3(6). https://doi.org/10.1186/gm255

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘23‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 7

47%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

40%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 5

45%

Social Sciences 2

18%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

18%

Psychology 2

18%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0