The reinforcement effects of deep soft soil foundation with high degree of saturation under dynamic compaction

10Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The dynamic compaction method is effective to reinforce soft soil foundation with a low degree of saturation. However, deep soft soil foundation with high degree of saturation has some different characteristics. It has been widely considered that dynamic compaction method is unsuitable to improve the characters of deep soft soil foundation with high degree of saturation. In this article, we will show that the dynamic compaction method with vacuum well-point dewatering is effective to deep soft soil foundation with high degree of saturation reinforcement. In situ and laboratorial experiments are used to assess the reinforcement effect of the deep soft soil foundation with high degree of saturation. Our results show that the dynamic compaction method causes long dissipation time of pore water pressure, and the dynamic compaction method with vacuum well-point dewatering makes construction time of a project 25% shorter. The effective depth of deep soft soil foundation with high degree of saturation reinforcement using the two experimental methods can reach to 8.0 m. In comparison with the total settlement and layered settlement of the dynamic compaction method with vacuum well-point dewatering, the dynamic compaction method settlement is relatively smaller. For soils with depth of 4 m, the reinforcement effect of dynamic compaction method with vacuum well-point dewatering is obviously superior to dynamic compaction method. Based on these results, we suggest construction procedures for different reinforcement depth of soils and construction time.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wei, J., Men, Y., Zhu, F., Le, H., & Fan, H. (2018). The reinforcement effects of deep soft soil foundation with high degree of saturation under dynamic compaction. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018782633

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free