Believers, skeptics, and failure in conflict resolution

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This book discusses the following questions: Why are some conflicts so enduring and why is conflict resolution so hard? The author begins by introducing two conflicting perspectives, Skeptics and Believers, to highlight the lack of consensus on conflict resolution. The book further examines the literature on the sources of violent conflict, including ethnic, economic, environmental, and religious sources, and investigates the claim that an absence of knowledge, power, or political will are at the center of conflict resolution failures. By focusing on the problem of state formation, the author demonstrates the ways in which the nature of the state contributes to violent conflict. In the end, conflict resolution fails because individuals, groups, and external powers choose war and often prefer it over peaceful alternatives.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Spears, I. S. (2019). Believers, skeptics, and failure in conflict resolution. Believers, Skeptics, and Failure in Conflict Resolution (pp. 1–233). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14144-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free