An Update on the Hazards and Risks of Forensic Anthropology, Part II: Field and Laboratory Considerations

2Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper focuses on potential hazards and risks to forensic anthropologists while working in the field and laboratory in North America. Much has changed since Galloway and Snodgrass published their seminal article addressing these issues. The increased number of forensic practitioners combined with new information about potential hazards calls for an updated review of these pathogens and chemicals. Discussion of pathogen hazards (Brucella, Borrelia burgdorferi, Yersinia pestis, Clostridium tetani and West Nile virus) includes important history, exposure routes, environmental survivability, early symptoms, treatments with corresponding morbidity and mortality rates, and decontamination measures. Additionally, data pertaining to the use of formaldehyde in the laboratory environment have resulted in updated safety regulations, and these are highlighted. These data should inform field and laboratory protocols. The hazards of working directly with human remains are discussed in a companion article, "An Update on the Hazards and Risks of Forensic Anthropology, Part I: Human Remains."

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roberts, L. G., Dabbs, G. R., & Spencer, J. R. (2016). An Update on the Hazards and Risks of Forensic Anthropology, Part II: Field and Laboratory Considerations. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 61, 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12949

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free