Age Differences in Material Deprivation in Finland: How do Consensus and Prevalence-Based Weighting Approaches Change the Picture?

4Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

While material deprivation is often used to measure poverty, analyses focusing on the measurement of material deprivation are scarce. This study provides new information on material deprivation by analyzing how differences in the considerations of necessities and possession of deprivation items among all respondents and within population subgroups affect group-level differences in material deprivation in Finland. In line with many previous studies on material deprivation, this study focused on age groups. There is a significant age gradient regarding considerations of necessities, possession, and deprivation of many deprivation items. On average, younger adults experience material deprivation more often than older adults do. This study considers the differences in the considerations of necessities and possession of deprivation items using different weighting approaches. The study found that these differences are not largely transmitted to deprivation indices. Two causes of this finding were found: (1) individuals, on average, are not deprived of items in which there are differences between age groups regarding consensus and prevalence and (2) in those items in which deprivation is high, the consensus and the prevalence rates are often lower compared to other items. The results provide new information on which factors are important when using weighting approaches to measure material deprivation.

References Powered by Scopus

On the significance of age in sociology.

286Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On multidimensional indices of poverty

250Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Using non-monetary deprivation indicators to analyze poverty and social exclusion: Lessons from Europe?

190Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Multidimensional Deprivation and Subgroup Heterogeneity of Rural Households in China: Empirical Evidence from Latent Variable Estimation Methods

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Association Between Age and Subjective Economic Hardship Across the Income Distribution in Europe

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

‘The Rise of Mass Poverty’? Breadline Britain/Poverty and Social Exclusion (1983–2012) Evidence Revisited

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ilmakunnas, I., & Mäkinen, L. (2021). Age Differences in Material Deprivation in Finland: How do Consensus and Prevalence-Based Weighting Approaches Change the Picture? Social Indicators Research, 154(2), 393–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02571-w

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 2

50%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

25%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free