Non-credible symptom report in the clinical evaluation of adult ADHD: development and initial validation of a new validity index embedded in the Conners’ adult ADHD rating scales

12Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

As attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a feasible target for individuals aiming to procure stimulant medication or accommodations, there is a high clinical need for accurate assessment of adult ADHD. Proven falsifiability of commonly used diagnostic instruments is therefore of concern. The present study aimed to develop a new, ADHD-specific infrequency index to aid the detection of non-credible self-report. Disorder-specific adaptations of four detection strategies were embedded into the Conners’ Adult ADHD Rating Scales (CAARS) and tested for infrequency among credible neurotypical controls (n = 1001) and credible adults with ADHD (n = 100). The new index’ ability to detect instructed simulators (n = 242) and non-credible adults with ADHD (n = 22) was subsequently examined using ROC analyses. Applying a conservative cut-off score, the new index identified 30% of participants instructed to simulate ADHD while retaining a specificity of 98%. Items assessing supposed symptoms of ADHD proved most useful in distinguishing genuine patients with ADHD from simulators, whereas inquiries into unusual symptom combinations produced a small effect. The CAARS Infrequency Index (CII) outperformed the new infrequency index in terms of sensitivity (46%), but not overall classification accuracy as determined in ROC analyses. Neither the new infrequency index nor the CII detected non-credible adults diagnosed with ADHD with adequate accuracy. In contrast, both infrequency indices showed high classification accuracy when used to detect symptom over-report. Findings support the new indices’ utility as an adjunct measure in uncovering feigned ADHD, while underscoring the need to differentiate general over-reporting from specific forms of feigning.

References Powered by Scopus

Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale

3209Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The prevalence and correlates of adult ADHD in the United States: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication

3000Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The World Health Organization adult ADHD self-report scale (ASRS): A short screening scale for use in the general population

2336Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Predictive value of performance validity testing and symptom validity testing in psychoeducational assessment

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Scores in Self-Report Questionnaires Assessing Adult ADHD Can Be Influenced by Negative Response Bias but Are Unrelated to Performance on Executive Function and Attention Tests

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Joint Consideration of Validity Indicators Embedded in Conners’ Adult ADHD Rating Scales (CAARS)

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Becke, M., Tucha, L., Weisbrod, M., Aschenbrenner, S., Tucha, O., & Fuermaier, A. B. M. (2021). Non-credible symptom report in the clinical evaluation of adult ADHD: development and initial validation of a new validity index embedded in the Conners’ adult ADHD rating scales. Journal of Neural Transmission, 128(7), 1045–1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-021-02318-y

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

63%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

13%

Researcher 2

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 13

72%

Neuroscience 2

11%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

11%

Social Sciences 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free