Comparison of Cumulative Live Birth Rate Between Aged PCOS Women and Controls in IVF/ICSI Cycles

12Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The present study aimed to assess whether women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) ≥35 years age undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles experienced a higher cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) over a two-year period compared with age- and body mass index (BMI)-matched patients with tubal factor infertility. Through propensity score matching (PSM) approach, the authors retrospectively analyzed the IVF/ICSI outcomes of 263 PCOS patients (35-46 years of age [mean, 37 years]) and 526 age- and BMI-matched tubal factor controls two years after oocyte retrieval. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to explore factors influencing cumulative live birth. Women with PCOS exhibited better ovarian reserve and response, and higher CLBR in two years compared with age- and BMI-matched controls (CLBR: 55.51% in PCOS vs. 38.02% in control, p<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the number of transferable embryos and antral follicle counts were both significant independent factors predicting cumulative live birth after adjusting for female age, female body mass index, percentage of transferred blastocysts, number of embryos transferred per embryo-transfer cycle, diagnosis of PCOS and freeze-all cycles (p<0.001, p=0.045). Women with PCOS ≥ 35 years of age demonstrated a higher CLBR over two years compared with age- and BMI-matched controls. This could be explained by favorable oocyte reserve and more available embryos compared with controls, which overcome the compromised oocyte quality in aged PCOS patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mai, Z., Liu, M., Pan, P., Li, L., Huang, J., Chen, X., & Yang, D. (2021). Comparison of Cumulative Live Birth Rate Between Aged PCOS Women and Controls in IVF/ICSI Cycles. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.724333

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free