Supporting people with pain-related distress in primary care consultations: a qualitative study

2Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background Low mood and distress are commonly reported by people who have persistent musculoskeletal (MSK) pain, which may be labelled as 'depression'. It is important to understand how pain-related distress is conceptualised and managed in primary care consultations. Aim To explore understanding of pain-related distress and depression from the perspectives of people with persistent MSK pain and GPs. Design and setting Qualitative study with people with persistent MSK pain and GPs from different parts of the UK. Method Semi-structured interviews conducted remotely and data analysed thematically. Results Most participants reported challenges in distinguishing between distress and depression in the context of persistent MSK pain, but also described strategies to make this distinction. Some people described how acceptance of their situation was key and involved optimism about the future and creation of a new identity. Some GPs expressed 'therapeutic nihilism', with uncertainty about the cause of pain and how to manage people with both persistent MSK pain and distress in primary care consultations, while GPs who could identify and build on optimism with patients described how to help the patient to move forwards. Conclusion This study offers a framework for the primary care consultation with patients presenting with pain-related distress. GPs should recognise the impact of persistent MSK pain on the patient and support the person in coming to terms with their pain, explore how the person feels about the future, encourage optimism, and support self-management strategies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shivji, N. A., Geraghty, A. W. A., Birkinshaw, H., Pincus, T., Johnson, H., Little, P., … Chew-Graham, C. A. (2022). Supporting people with pain-related distress in primary care consultations: a qualitative study. British Journal of General Practice, 72(724), E825–E833. https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0120

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free