Science as customized and customizing: The roles of science in the “religion/worldviews in the public sphere” debate

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

It is increasingly acknowledged that there hardly exists anything like an “uncustomized” science, that is to quote Mikael Stenmark’s introduction to this volume, a science that is “governed not merely by epistemic goals, such as increased knowledge and explanatory power” (p. 2). Today, it is considered more or less a truism that science not only speaks to society, but also that society speaks back-though to what extent and by what means remains a controversial question (Nowotny et al., 2001; Nowotny, 2005). At the same time, science plays an enormously important public role as a source of information that society draws on in a multitude of settings, not least in public deliberation, the practices where citizens come together to discuss and decide on matters of public concern.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zackariasson, U. (2014). Science as customized and customizing: The roles of science in the “religion/worldviews in the public sphere” debate. In The Customization of Science: The Impact of Religious and Political Worldviews on Contemporary Science (pp. 158–175). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137379610_10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free