Challenges in evaluating an Arthritis Self-Management Program for people with hip and knee osteoarthritis in real-world clinical settings

35Citations
Citations of this article
141Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the influence of a 6-week Arthritis Self-Management Program (ASMP) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and self-management skills in clinical settings. Methods: Individuals with hip or knee osteoarthritis referred to orthopedic surgeons or rheumatologists at 6 hospitals in Victoria, Australia, were recruited. In a randomized controlled trial, participants received the Stanford ASMP and self-help book (intervention) or book only (control). Assessments included the Assessment of Quality of Life instrument (AQoL; range-0.04 to 1.00) and Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ; range 1-6) at baseline and up to 12 months. The primary outcome was HRQOL at 12 months (assessed using the AQoL). Results: Recruitment was concluded early due to persistent challenges including infrequent referrals and patient inability or disinterest in participating. Of 1125 individuals screened, only 120 were randomized (control, n = 62; intervention, n = 58). Seven ASMP were conducted while 18 scheduled ASMP were cancelled. Forty-four of 58 intervention group participants received the intervention as allocated (76%); all control group participants were sent the book (100%). Ninety-four participants (78%) completed 12-month assessments (control, 90%; intervention, 66%). There was no difference in HRQOL at 12 months (adjusted mean difference-0.02, 95% CI-0.09 to 0.05). At 6 weeks, the intervention group reported higher heiQ skill and technique acquisition scores (adjusted mean difference 0.29, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.55); however, this dissipated by 3 months. Conclusion: Significant challenges hampered this evaluation of the ASMP. The observed lack of enthusiasm from potential referrers and patients raises doubts about the practicality of this intervention in real-world settings. Copyright © 2012 The Journal of Rheumatology.

References Powered by Scopus

Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress

7684Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis: Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee

5872Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hip

1694Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis

2294Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Self-management education programmes for osteoarthritis

117Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A scoping review of the literature on benefits and challenges of participating in patient education programs aimed at promoting self-management for people living with chronic illness

103Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ackerman, I. N., Buchbinder, R., & Osborne, R. H. (2012). Challenges in evaluating an Arthritis Self-Management Program for people with hip and knee osteoarthritis in real-world clinical settings. Journal of Rheumatology, 39(5), 1047–1055. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.111358

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 44

61%

Researcher 15

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 45

56%

Nursing and Health Professions 23

29%

Business, Management and Accounting 7

9%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 5

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free