Organising and delivering the modern paralympic games: Contemporary debates relating to integration and distinction

Abstract

In this chapter, we address the philosophical debate about an inclusive society in relation to organising an event that aims to build accessible sport facilities, develop sport pathways and influence societal understandings of disability. The push and pull between integration for the purpose of efficiency of resources, and separation (of roles, of logos etc.) for distinction and recognition, is a challenge that every Organising Committee (OC) faces when developing the overall structure and defining the Paralympic brand. Through a case example of the Vancouver 2010 Paralympic Games, we demonstrate the tension in organising the Paralympic Games, emphasising the balance required, and the inherent need for, and importance of a successful Games. In particular, we frame our discussion around the idea of distinction from the perspective of the OC from the very outset of involvement (i.e. the Bid Process) to the conclusion of the Games and ceasing of existence of this very committee.