Q-particles and the nature of covert movement: Evidence from Bùlì

5Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There are a number of intriguing issues surrounding wh-questions that have drawn considerable attention in the literature. Among the most commonly observed is the fact that in certain languages, wh-phrases move overtly from their base-generated positions to a clause-peripheral position, while in other languages the wh-phrases remain in-situ. A well known and contentious issue, to which this paper contributes with novel data from Bùlì, is the status of the in-situ wh-phrase. For instance, do in-situ phrases undergo covert movement? If so how is this movement similar or different from overt movement? I argue that Bùlì distinguishes two kinds of wh-in-situ phrases: one undergoes covert movement, a movement that I claim is comparable in many ways to overt wh-movement, while the other one does not. The key to this observation is the presence of an overt Q-particle in the language. Whenever the Q-particle is absent, the signs of movement disappear. This provides a very transparent set of arguments in favor of the mixed view that sometimes you have movement of wh-in-situ and other other times you do not.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sulemana, A. R. (2019). Q-particles and the nature of covert movement: Evidence from Bùlì. Glossa, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/GJGL.810

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free