Current status of neurofeedback for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

36Citations
Citations of this article
111Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

As conventional treatments offer incomplete benefit for over 33 % of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and many refuse to try them, additional treatments are needed. One of the most promising is neurofeedback (NF, EEG biofeedback), which trains the brain with real-time video/audio information about its electrical activity measured from scalp electrodes. Since 2010, data from 8 randomized controlled studies of NF have been published with overall mean effect sizes of: 0.40 (all measures), 0.42 (ADHD measures), 0.56 (inattention), and 0.54 (hyperactivity/impulsivity). Unfortunately, the benefit reported from randomized studies has not been observed in the few small blinded studies conducted. Main study strengths include randomization, evidence-based diagnostic assessments, multi-domain treatment outcomes, use of some type of blinding, and sham control conditions. Main study limitations include lack of large samples, abnormal EEG participant selection, double-blinding, and testing of blind validity and sham inertness. Most recently, a collaborative NF research group has been planning a definitive double-blind well-controlled trial. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lofthouse, N., Arnold, L. E., & Hurt, E. (2012, October). Current status of neurofeedback for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Current Psychiatry Reports. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-012-0301-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free