Cardiac telerehabilitation in a middle-income country: analysis of adherence, effectiveness and cost through a randomized clinical trial

9Citations
Citations of this article
97Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) are already well established; however, such intervention has been underused, mainly in low- and middle-income countries. AIM: To compare adherence, effectiveness, and cost of a home CR with the traditional CR (TCR) in a middle-income country (MIC). DESIGN: Single-blind randomized control trial. SETTING: A university hospital. POPULATION: Individuals with coronary disease that were eligible were invited to participate. A randomized sample of 51 individuals was selected, where two participants were not included by not meeting inclusion criteria. METHODS: The home-CR group participated in health education activities, carried out two supervised exercise sessions, and was instructed to carry out 58 sessions at home. Weekly telephone calls were made. The TCR group held 24 supervised exercise sessions and were instructed to carry out 36 sessions at home. RESULTS: 49 individuals (42 male, 56.37±10.35years) participated in the study, 23 in the home-CR group and 26 in the TCR group. After the intervention, adherence in the home-CR and TCR groups was 94.18% and 79.08%, respectively, with no significant difference (P=0.191). Both protocols were effective for the other variables, with no differences. The cost per patient for the service was lower in the home-CR (US$ 59.31) than in the TCR group (US$ 135.05). CONCLUSIONS: CR performed at home in an MIC demonstrated similar adherence and effectiveness compared to the TCR program, but with a lower cost for the service. The results corroborate the possibility of using home CR programs, even in MICs, after exercise risk stratification and under remote supervision. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Home-CR can contribute to overcome participants' barriers with compatible cost. Home-CR is effective in improving functional capacity and risk factors control. Perform risk stratification and remote supervision are essential to offer Home-CR.

References Powered by Scopus

The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure

32069Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (Sf-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection

31031Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (The Duke Activity Status Index)

1340Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The cost-effectiveness of exercise-based cardiac telerehabilitation intervention: a systematic review

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effectiveness of home-based cardiac telerehabilitation in patients with heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Lima, A. P., Pereira, D. G., Nascimento, I. O., Martins, T. H., Oliveira, A. C., Nogueira, T. S., & Britto, R. R. (2022). Cardiac telerehabilitation in a middle-income country: analysis of adherence, effectiveness and cost through a randomized clinical trial. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 58(4), 598–605. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07340-3

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

71%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

14%

Researcher 2

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 11

52%

Medicine and Dentistry 6

29%

Social Sciences 2

10%

Psychology 2

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free