Validation of the Edinburgh postpartum depression scale in a population of puerperal women in Mexico

64Citations
Citations of this article
113Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) has been validated and used successfully in detecting postnatal depression in several language versions in a number of countries. However, there is not any Mexican version of the EPDS that had been validated. Therefore, we sought to validate a Spanish translated Mexican version of the EPDS in a population of puerperal Mexican women. Methods: One hundred puerperal women within their three month postpartum period attending routine postnatal consultations in a public hospital in Durango City, Mexico participated in the study. The participants were divided into two groups: one group included 49 women with less than 4 weeks of postpartum, and the other group included 51 women within 4 to 13 weeks of postpartum. All participants submitted a Spanish translated Mexican version of the EPDS and were interviewed by a psychiatrist to assess major and minor depression by using DSM-IV criteria. Results: Out of the 49 women with less than 4 weeks of postpartum, 4 were found as suffering from major depression and none from minor depression by using the DSM-IV criteria. In this group of women we found that the best EPDS score for screening depression was 11/12. This threshold showed a sensitivity of 75% (95% CI: 63.8-86.2), a specificity of 93% (95% CI: 84.6-100), a positive predictive value of 50%, a negative predictive value of 97.6%, and an area under the curve of 0.84. While in the 51 women within 4 to 13 weeks of postpartum, 7 were found as suffering from major depression and 1 from minor depression by using the DSM-IV criteria. In this group we found that the best EPDS score for screening depression was 7/8. This threshold showed a sensitivity of 75% (95% CI: 66.1-83.9), a specificity of 84% (95% CI: 76.1-91.9), a positive predictive value of 46.2%, a negative predictive value of 94.7% and an area under the curve of 0.80. Conclusion: The Mexican version of the EPDS can be considered for screening depression in puerperal Mexican women whenever cut-off scores of 11/12 and 7/8 in women with less than 4 weeks and within 4 to 13 weeks of postpartum are used, respectively. © 2006 Alvarado-Esquivel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

Detection of Postnatal Depression: Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression scale

10876Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Perinatal depression: A systematic review of prevalence and incidence

2601Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Antenatal risk factors for postpartum depression: A synthesis of recent literature

1487Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Validation studies of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for the antenatal period

233Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS): Translation and validation study of the Iranian version

181Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale against both DSM-5 and ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for depression

155Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alvarado-Esquivel, C., Sifuentes-Alvarez, A., Salas-Martinez, C., & Martínez-García, S. (2006). Validation of the Edinburgh postpartum depression scale in a population of puerperal women in Mexico. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-0179-2-33

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 28

56%

Researcher 8

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 22

46%

Psychology 13

27%

Social Sciences 9

19%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free