Scientific Images and Robustness

1Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

According to W.C. Wimsatt, the robustness of an experimental result relies on the scientist’s use of multiple independent derivations. This definition corresponds to what a laboratory ethnographer may observe concerning research practices in astrophysics. In this field, establishing experimental results or detecting new entities most commonly requires images produced by telescopes functioning on different physical principles. This study will focus on a specific astrophysics paper in order to demonstrate that: (1) images, contrary to what is usually believed, play a central role in the argumentation, with the main text only serving as a long commentary on the images; (2) researchers establish a series of converging proofs in order to elaborate their conclusions. In other words, we will insist on the fact that it is an inter-instrumental procedure that allows the community of researchers to consider their results as true, until proven otherwise, as suggested by the fallibilist perspective which prevails in scientific practice and to which W.C. Wimsatt subscribes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Allamel-Raffin, C., & Gangloff, J. L. (2012). Scientific Images and Robustness. In Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science (Vol. 292, pp. 169–188). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2759-5_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free